Unpacking 2024
Season’s greetings to all subscribers (and occasional perusers) of Unpacking Climate Risk!
Tony is off somewhere in Europe working on his tan, while I (Louie) am snug and warm in my New York apartment after a holiday sojourn in the UK. Gray skies, local ales, and enough cheese to sink a battleship – what more could you want of the season?
Anyway, here on the threshold of 2025 it makes sense to offer a rundown of Unpacking Climate Risk’s first year, and highlight some of the blockbuster articles that sent our LinkedIn notifications afire. (Reminder: you can harass contact Tony and I on the nerdiest social network here and here).
By The Numbers 🧮
In the (almost) one year since Unpacking Climate Risk launched, we have:
- Published 130 articles (around 2.5 a week)
- Achieved >25,000 page views
- Earned 113 free subscribers
- Earned 54 paying subscribers
Tony and I very much enjoy writing the newsletter (well, opinion-letter may be more apt) and appreciate the support of all those who have subscribed.
If you want to be added to the mailing list, you can sign up here👇
And if you want to support us further, why not take out a paying subscription? We’ll even give you 20% off 👇
We’ll be planning our next steps in the New Year, and will be sure to keep you posted. (Indeed, if you have any thoughts on how to evolve the publication, do get in touch).
For now, enjoy this list of our “Top 10 Most Read”. And if you’re caught up in the holiday spirit, buy us a coffee using this button👇
See you on the other side!
Louie & Tony
Unpacking Climate Risk’s Top 10 Most Read 2024
- What if emissions aren’t a good proxy for transition risk?
- Why I’m a transition finance skeptic
- Trust me, I’m an expert
- Decoding asset managers’ flight from Climate Action 100+
- The climate transition needs more bank failures
- Maybe climate scenarios are 'malarkey'?
- Why understanding Exposure At Default is critical to climate risk management
- Why do central bankers cherry-pick climate research?
- The Fed proves it: climate scenario analysis is bad public policy
- On the toothlessness of the NGFS
Member discussion